Environmental Policy

Our work is driven by the same principles of sustainability and reduction in emissions which drive environmental policy. As world leaders in research into the sustainable use of materials we provide evidence to inform and support the development of strategies for national and international policy developement.

Our reputation has enabled us to develop a strong network at national and international level. We are in regular contact with five key departments of the UK government, exploring the policy context of material demand. Professor Allwood was a lead author of the 5th Assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), is a member of the UK’s Energy Research Partnership and was the UK’s delegate on innovation at the launch of the G7 Alliance on Resource Efficiency. We contribute to ongoing dialogue on industrial development in a lower carbon future.

We facilitate discussions between policy and industry stakeholders about a more sustainable industrial future. For example, we 

  • have worked with DEFRA on their circular economy roadmap
  • are active in the development of DECC’s industrial roadmap for a low carbon future
  • are running a professional network on material efficiency in construction, aiming to deliver to the Green Construction Board recommendations about the strategies by which the government’s 2025 construction strategy can be implemented in practice

The pathway to significant climate mitigation will depend on policy deployment, but in the short term public appetite for policies that influence energy demand is limited, and if applied locally they could create a competitive disadvantage which would ultimately have no effect on emissions. As a result, the immediate challenge of bringing about Use Less change is to transform the basis on which policy ideas are proposed and evaluated.

This is now a key priority for our future research and the avenues which we think are promising include:

  • A new examination of the design of satisfying jobs. Government, Industry and Households share an interest in the quality of working lives, yet this currently gets little attention and the pursuit of more creative work might support a re-substitution of labour for energy.
  • Many of the material inefficiencies we have identified occur “at the interface” between one business – such as a material provider – and another – such as a car maker. A more collective evaluation of how complete supply chains take choices about materials is likely to lead to new opportunities for saving.
  • Many products sold today are packaged as generic commodities, with the sophisticated wrappings of marketing techniques used to persuade purchasers that a former ‘luxury’ is now a ‘necessity.’ Such goods are ‘sealed’ from user interference, and therefore inviting little participation or connection. In contrast, more personalised goods designed for participation might foster a different and more satisfying form of “user-ship”

In the UK, recent policy on industry has been reactive not proactive: in response to a crisis, ministers and civil servants seem ‘quick fix’ solutions usually by aiming to support incumbent large industries. This supports an inertia, where in contrast it would be possible to stimulate a wider participation in developing an expanded basket of policy options ready for evaluation as each policy crisis arises.

Political will to deploy new policies depends largely on public agendas and these are, above all, set by television. Yet the bulk materials currently have little interest for programme makers and it is difficult to create compelling programmes about climate change, which lacks a location, a hero or villain and an aspirational denouement. New creativity may find new means to re-connect the public to the materials that sustain them.

New technologies which begin with laboratory discoveries go through a development process to become widespread products, and this process is often described by Motorola’s famous “Technology Readiness Levels.” In parallel, in preparing for widespread adoption of Use Less living, we can imagine a scale of “Societal Readiness Levels” where demand reduction is currently only at the very earliest stages. Above all, we need to build experience of living well with less material, and a key activity for us and others working in this area, is to stimulate demonstrator projects.